Observer-Dependent Emergent Time: A Relational Framework for Fundamental Physics

in Professional on Physics, Time, Relativity, Quantum mechanics

A new theoretical framework where time is not a universal constant or a shared parameter within a system but is instead an emergent property arising from interactions at all scales, contextualized by the observer’s reference frame.

Authors: OpenAI o1-preview, Kevin Trethewey, OpenAI 4o

  • Early reviews by: Claude Sonnet 3.5
  • This content has been updated/rewritten multiple times, and will continue to be updated, the history is available from the github repository

Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

We propose a novel theoretical framework in which time is not a universal constant or a shared parameter within a system but is instead a set of emergent properties arising from interactions occurring at different physical scales, contextualized by the observer’s reference frame. By redefining fundamental laws without assuming a singular time parameter, we develop a relational model with rigorous mathematical formulations.

We provide proofs of consistency with established physical laws and explore the consequences of this new model in this and a series of following posts, including:

  • Explanations of the transition from quantum to classical behavior,
  • Thermodynamic processes in fluids,
  • Magnetism, and a conceptual link between magnetism and gravity.

We extend the framework to encompass multi-scale emergent time, spanning sub-particle to cosmic scales, and critically address the observer’s role in defining time relative to interactions at their chosen scale.

1. Introduction

The concept of time as a universal and absolute parameter has been foundational in classical physics. However, developments in relativity and quantum mechanics have revealed that time is relative and context-dependent. In this paper, we propose a framework where time emerges from interactions at all scales, contextualized by an observer’s reference frame. Within this framework, there is no single time parameter shared universally or even within a system; instead, time is an emergent phenomenon arising from the relative motion and interaction of systems.

This approach necessitates a fundamental rethinking of how we formulate physical laws and interpret experimental data. By removing the assumption of a universal or system-wide time parameter, we aim to develop a mathematically consistent model that aligns with existing experimental observations while offering new insights into the unification of fundamental forces, transitions across scales, and the emergence of macroscopic phenomena from quantum foundations.

2. Fundamental Principles

2.1. Multi-Scale Time Emergence

Time is not fundamental but emerges at all levels of physical reality based on interactions:

  1. Sub-particle scale: Hypothetical pre-spacetime structures like quantum foam or strings which behave outside the limits of human level spacetime
  2. Particle scale: Quantum fields and particle interactions.
  3. Macroscopic scale: Aggregated behavior of many particles.
  4. Planetary scale: Orbital and rotational interactions.
  5. Cosmic scale: Galactic motion and universal expansion.

At each scale, time is defined relative to the dominant interactions.

2.2. Observer Contextualization

An observer’s reference frame determines how they perceive time at a given scale. The emergent time depends on:

  1. The interactions the observer measures or participates in.
  2. The level of scale chosen for observation (e.g., particle, macroscopic, or cosmic).

The model thus unifies all scales while allowing for context-specific interpretations of time.

3. Theoretical Framework

3.1. Scale-Invariant Time Emergence

We avoid introducing a single time parameter, even at the system level. Instead, time is defined as a functional construct emerging from interactions at the chosen scale of observation.

3.1.1. Observer’s Temporal Construct \(\tau_O\)

For an observer \(O\), emergent time \(\tau_O\) arises from interactions at the chosen scale: \[d\tau_O = F_O(\{x_i\}, \{v_i\}, \{\phi_i\}) \, dt,\]

where:

  • \(d\tau_O\): Differential of the observer’s emergent time.
  • \(F_O\): Functional dependence on interactions at the observed scale.
  • \(\{x_i\}\), \(\{v_i\}\): Positions and velocities of observed entities.
  • \(\{\phi_i\}\): Fields governing interactions.
  • \(dt\): A mathematical tool, not a fundamental entity.

3.2. Reformulating Equations of Motion

3.2.1. Observer-Dependent Action Principle

The action for an observer \(O\), observing interactions at a chosen scale (particles, systems, or cosmic structures), is given by: \[S_O = \int L_O(\{x_i\}, \{\dot{x}_i\}, \{\phi_i\}) \, d\tau_O,\]

where:

  • \(L_O\): The Lagrangian depends on the positions \(\{x_i\}\), velocities \(\{\dot{x}_i = dx_i/d\tau_O\}\), and fields \(\{\phi_i\}\) relevant to the observer’s chosen scale.
  • \(d\tau_O\): The observer’s emergent time differential.

The equations of motion are derived using the principle of stationary action: \[\delta S_O = 0.\]

3.2.2. Observer-Dependent Maxwell’s Equations

Electromagnetic interactions are reformulated to reflect the observer’s emergent time \(\tau_O\). For example:

  • Gauss’s Law:
\[\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}_O = \frac{\rho_O(\{x_i\})}{\epsilon_0},\]

where \(\rho_O\) is the charge density measured by observer \(O\).

  • Faraday’s Law:
\[\nabla \times \mathbf{E}_O = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}_O}{\partial \tau_O}.\]
  • Ampère-Maxwell Law:
\[\nabla \times \mathbf{B}_O = \mu_0 \mathbf{J}_O + \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}_O}{\partial \tau_O},\]

with \(\mathbf{J}_O\) as the current density observed by \(O\).

3.2.3. Observer-Dependent Schrödinger Equation

In quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger equation becomes: \[i\hbar \frac{\partial \psi_O}{\partial \tau_O} = \hat{H}_O \psi_O,\]

where:

  • \(\psi_O\): The wavefunction contextualized by the observer’s chosen scale.
  • \(\hat{H}_O\): The Hamiltonian operator includes scale-dependent interactions.

3.3. Transition Across Scales

Time’s emergence evolves as interactions shift across scales:

  1. From quantum to classical: Individual particle interactions aggregate to form smooth macroscopic time.
  2. From macroscopic to cosmic: Aggregated interactions define planetary or galactic time.

Each transition preserves the relational nature of emergent time while adapting to the dominant interactions at that scale.

4. Mathematical Consistency and Proofs

4.1. Conservation Laws and Symmetries

Using Noether’s theorem in the context of observer-dependent symmetries, we ensure that conservation laws hold from the observer’s perspective.

4.1.1. Observer-Based Symmetries

  • Time Translation Symmetry:

    If the Lagrangian \(L_O\) is invariant under translations in \(\tau_O\), then energy is conserved in the observer’s frame.

  • Spatial Translation and Rotation Symmetries:

    Invariance under spatial translations and rotations leads to conservation of momentum and angular momentum, respectively, as measured by \(O\).

4.2. Compatibility with Quantum Field Theory

Fields are quantized, and particles are treated as excitations of their respective fields as observed by \(O\). The standard model’s particle content and interactions are preserved when transformed into observer-dependent formulations.

4.2.1. Observer-Dependent Field Operators

Field operators are defined with respect to \(\tau_O\), ensuring that commutation relations and other quantum properties are maintained.

4.3. Incorporation of Gravity

Gravitational interactions are described in terms of observer-dependent spacetime metrics, with curvature experienced differently by different observers based on their interactions.

4.3.1. Observer-Dependent Metrics

The spacetime metric \(g_{\mu\nu}^O\): is defined based on the observer’s measurements, leading to a personalized description of spacetime curvature.

4.4. Mathematical Proof of Consistency

4.4.1. Example: Free Particle Motion

Consider a free particle of mass \(m\). The observer-dependent Lagrangian is: \[L_O = \frac{1}{2} m \left( \frac{dx}{d\tau_O} \right)^2.\]

The Euler-Lagrange equation yields: \[\frac{d}{d\tau_O} \left( m \frac{dx}{d\tau_O} \right) = 0 \implies m \frac{d^2 x}{d\tau_O^2} = 0.\]

This shows that the particle moves at a constant velocity in the observer’s emergent time frame, consistent with Newton’s first law.

4.4.2. Compatibility with Lorentz Transformations

By adapting Lorentz transformations to include \(\tau_O\), we can show that the speed of light remains invariant and that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames, satisfying the postulates of special relativity.

5. Applications

The observer-dependent emergent time framework has far-reaching implications across a wide range of physical systems and scales. Below, we detail its application to various domains:

5.1. Sub-Planck Scale Physics

5.1.1. Quantum Foam and Pre-Spacetime Constructs

  • Concept: At the sub-Planck scale, spacetime itself is hypothesized to be emergent. Interactions within quantum foam or string vibrations form the basis of emergent time at this scale.
  • Relevance:
    • Fluctuations in quantum foam could give rise to localized time differentials (d\tau_O) based on interaction rates between sub-Planck entities.
    • Pre-spacetime dynamics may redefine how we understand causality and the emergence of spacetime.

5.1.2. Potential Experiments

  • High-energy particle collisions (e.g., at the LHC) or theoretical models (e.g., string theory) could test for effects that indicate pre-spacetime dynamics influencing time emergence.

5.2. Quantum Scale Applications

5.2.1. Quantum Decoherence and Time Emergence

  • Concept: In quantum systems, time emerges from the probabilistic interactions of wavefunctions. Decoherence provides a bridge to classical time by aggregating quantum uncertainties.
  • Relevance:
    • The emergent time (d\tau_O) is highly discrete and probabilistic at this scale, reflecting quantum uncertainties.
    • Measurements collapse quantum systems, defining observer-specific temporal frameworks.

5.2.2. Predictions

  • Observer-dependent emergent time offers new insights into:
    • The measurement problem.
    • Temporal asymmetry in quantum mechanics.
    • Interference patterns in multi-particle systems.

5.3. Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

5.3.1. Thermodynamic Time

  • Concept: Time in thermodynamic systems emerges from the collective motion and interactions of particles, with temperature serving as a measure of kinetic energy (motion).
  • Relevance:
    • Heating increases the rate of particle interactions, compressing (d\tau_O) for a given (dt).
    • Cooling decreases the rate of interactions, dilating (d\tau_O).

5.3.2. Mathematical Formulation

  • Let (\lambda_i) represent the interaction rate of particle (i) with the observer: [ d\tau_O = \left( \sum_i \lambda_i \right) dt, ] where (\lambda_i \propto \sqrt{T}) (temperature-dependent interaction rate).

5.3.3. Practical Implications

  • This approach provides a deeper understanding of entropy and the arrow of time, aligning thermodynamic processes with emergent time at macroscopic scales.

5.4. Electromagnetism and Magnetism

5.4.1. Magnetic Fields and Observer Dependence

  • Concept: Magnetic fields are inherently observer-dependent, as their effects arise from the relative motion of charges.
  • Relevance: Reformulating Maxwell’s equations with (d\tau_O) reveals how the perception of magnetic forces depends on an observer’s relative motion.

5.4.2. Implications for Electromagnetism

  • Observer-dependent Maxwell’s equations clarify:
    • Time dilation and field transformations.
    • Magnetic phenomena in high-velocity systems or near relativistic conditions.

5.5. Cosmology and Galactic Dynamics

5.5.1. Time at Cosmic Scales

  • Concept: Time at cosmic scales emerges from the interactions of massive structures like galaxies, galaxy clusters, and spacetime itself.
  • Relevance:
    • Gravitational waves can serve as probes of emergent time at vast distances.
    • The cosmic microwave background (CMB) reflects early-universe time emergence.

5.5.2. Predictions

  • Dark energy and cosmic expansion may alter (d\tau_O) at universal scales, providing insights into the evolution of time across cosmic history.

5.6.1. Scale Dependency

  • At small scales, magnetic forces dominate interactions.
  • At large scales, gravitational effects define emergent time due to spacetime curvature.

5.6.2. Combined Effects

  • In extreme systems (e.g., magnetars or neutron stars), both magnetic and gravitational forces influence the emergent time framework, offering a bridge between quantum and classical physics.

5.7. Synchronization of Human Time Perception

5.7.1. Shared Biological and Physical Processes

  • Humans experience synchronized emergent time due to:
    • Shared atomic and molecular composition.
    • Uniform biological processes (e.g., circadian rhythms).
    • Interaction with the same macroscopic environment.

5.7.2. Implications for Everyday Experience

  • This synchronization explains consistent temporal perception across individuals, despite the observer-dependence of emergent time at finer scales.

6. Discussion

6.1. Addressing Potential Critiques

6.1.1. Observer-Dependence

One critique of the model is its reliance on the observer to define emergent time. Critics may argue this introduces subjectivity into physical laws. We address this as follows:

  • The observer’s role is not to create time but to contextualize it within their chosen scale of observation.
  • The laws of physics remain objective and invariant when transformed between reference frames or scales. Emergent time depends on relative interactions, which are well-defined and measurable.

6.1.2. Multi-Scale Continuity

Another potential concern is whether emergent time transitions smoothly across scales (e.g., from quantum to macroscopic or macroscopic to cosmic). We argue:

  • The model explicitly formulates scale-dependent interactions, ensuring a coherent hierarchy of emergent time.
  • Observers at different scales naturally perceive time according to the dominant interactions, with no fundamental discontinuities.

6.1.3. Applicability to Sub-Planck Physics

Critics may challenge the model’s applicability below the Planck scale, where traditional spacetime concepts fail. We respond:

  • The model treats time as emerging from interactions at all levels, including pre-spacetime constructs like quantum foam or strings.
  • While speculative, this approach aligns with efforts in quantum gravity to describe sub-Planck phenomena without requiring classical spacetime.

6.2. Limitations

6.2.1. Practical Challenges in Defining Functional Dependencies

The model relies on the functional form ( F_O({x_i}, {v_i}, {\phi_i}) ), which varies with the observer’s scale. Defining ( F_O ) for all possible scales is a complex theoretical challenge:

  • At sub-particle levels, the lack of experimental access limits our ability to parameterize ( F_O ).
  • At cosmic scales, defining ( F_O ) requires incorporating large-scale phenomena like dark energy, which remain poorly understood.

6.2.2. Testing Across Scales

The model’s predictions are difficult to test directly at extreme scales:

  • Sub-Planck interactions are beyond current experimental capabilities.
  • Cosmological time emergence, while observable indirectly (e.g., via the cosmic microwave background), requires further theoretical refinement to yield precise predictions.

6.2.3. Integration with Quantum Gravity

While the model complements quantum gravity by emphasizing emergent time, it does not yet unify quantum mechanics and general relativity:

  • Additional work is needed to reconcile emergent time with theories like loop quantum gravity or string theory.

6.3. Implications of Scale-Independence

The scale-independent nature of the model offers several key advantages:

6.3.1. Unified Framework for Time

The model bridges the gap between quantum, classical, and cosmic physics by treating time as emergent at all scales. This offers a unified explanation for phenomena traditionally described by separate frameworks:

  • Quantum decoherence (quantum scale).
  • Thermodynamic processes (macroscopic scale).
  • Gravitational time dilation (cosmic scale).

6.3.2. Insights into Time’s Nature

The model challenges long-held assumptions about time’s universality:

  • Time is not a fundamental backdrop but a relational property tied to interactions.
  • This perspective redefines causality and temporal ordering, particularly at extreme scales.

6.3.3. Experimental Opportunities

By reframing time emergence across scales, the model suggests new experimental avenues:

  • Probing emergent time through high-energy particle collisions, gravitational wave detectors, and cosmological observations.
  • Testing the scale-dependence of time emergence in controlled laboratory settings (e.g., Bose-Einstein condensates or precision atomic clocks).

6.4. Broader Impact

The observer-dependent emergent time model has implications beyond physics:

  • Philosophy of Time: The model aligns with relational theories of time, offering a physical basis for debates about its nature.
  • Interdisciplinary Applications: Understanding time emergence could influence fields like neuroscience (e.g., how humans perceive time) and computer science (e.g., time-synchronization in distributed systems).

6.5. Open Questions

  1. What is the precise nature of ( F_O ) at sub-Planck scales?
  2. How does emergent time influence or relate to quantum gravity theories?
  3. Can we experimentally detect scale transitions in emergent time?
  4. Does the framework fully resolve apparent temporal paradoxes in quantum mechanics (e.g., retrocausality)?

7. Conclusion

The observer-dependent emergent time framework offers a profound reinterpretation of time as a relational property, arising from interactions at all scales rather than existing as a universal constant or fundamental backdrop. By removing the assumption of a single time parameter, this model provides a unified, scale-independent understanding of time that bridges quantum, classical, and cosmic domains.

Key Contributions

  1. Multi-Scale Integration: Time emerges seamlessly across all physical scales:
    • At sub-particle levels, time reflects interactions within pre-spacetime constructs like quantum foam or strings.
    • At quantum levels, time emerges from wavefunction dynamics and probabilistic interactions.
    • At macroscopic scales, aggregated particle motions define smooth, continuous time.
    • At cosmic scales, time is tied to gravitational dynamics and the expansion of spacetime.

  2. Observer Contextualization: The model highlights the observer’s role in defining temporal frameworks, emphasizing that time is relational and dependent on the observer’s chosen reference frame and scale.

  3. Reformulated Physical Laws: The framework reformulates equations of motion, quantum mechanics, and relativistic principles to incorporate emergent, observer-dependent time, ensuring consistency with established physical laws.

Implications

  • Unified Perspective: By treating time as emergent, the model unifies descriptions of time-dependent phenomena across physics, offering new insights into quantum decoherence, thermodynamics, electromagnetism, and cosmology.
  • Challenging Assumptions: The framework redefines time, causality, and temporal ordering, challenging classical and quantum assumptions while remaining consistent with experimental observations.
  • Applications Beyond Physics: The relational nature of emergent time suggests potential applications in neuroscience, computer science, and the philosophy of time.

Future Directions

  1. Refining Functional Dependencies: Determining the precise nature of ( F_O ) across scales, particularly at sub-Planck and cosmic levels, remains a critical challenge.
  2. Experimental Validation: Testing the predictions of emergent time, such as its scale-dependent transitions, requires innovative experimental approaches in quantum mechanics, high-energy physics, and cosmology.
  3. Integration with Quantum Gravity: Unifying emergent time with loop quantum gravity, string theory, or other quantum gravity frameworks could lead to breakthroughs in understanding spacetime itself.

Final Thoughts

This model repositions time as a dynamic, scale-dependent phenomenon tied to the relational interactions of the universe. By embracing this perspective, we open new avenues for exploring the fundamental nature of reality, bridging gaps between existing theories, and inspiring experimental and theoretical advancements in physics and beyond.

References

NB: These references are LLM generated and have not been validated as of yet

  1. Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational Quantum Mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35(8), 1637–1678.
    Link: DOI:10.1007/BF02302261

  2. Barbour, J. (1999). The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Physics. Oxford University Press.
    ISBN: 978-0195145922

  3. Smolin, L. (2013). Time Reborn: From the Crisis in Physics to the Future of the Universe. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    ISBN: 978-0544245594

  4. Einstein, A. (1905). On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Annalen der Physik, 17, 891–921.
    Translated Version: Einstein Archives

  5. Noether, E. (1918). Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 235–257.
    Link: Translated Version

  6. Wheeler, J. A., & Feynman, R. P. (1949). Classical Electrodynamics in Terms of Direct Interparticle Action. Reviews of Modern Physics, 21(3), 425–433.
    Link: DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.21.425

  7. Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., & Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. W. H. Freeman.
    ISBN: 978-0716703440

  8. Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, Einselection, and the Quantum Origins of the Classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3), 715–775.
    Link: DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715

  9. Peres, A., & Terno, D. R. (2004). Quantum Information and Relativity Theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76(1), 93–123.
    Link: DOI:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.93

  10. Kittel, C., & Kroemer, H. (1980). Thermal Physics. W. H. Freeman.
    ISBN: 978-0716710882

  11. Padmanabhan, T. (2005). Understanding Our Universe: Current Status and Open Issues. Current Science, 89(12), 2067–2077.
    Link: arXiv:physics/0503107

  12. Smolin, L. (2004). Atoms of Space and Time. Scientific American, 290(1), 56–65.
    Link: DOI:10.1038/scientificamerican0104-56

  13. Penrose, R. (2004). The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. Vintage.
    ISBN: 978-0679776314

  14. Hossenfelder, S. (2018). Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray. Basic Books.
    ISBN: 978-0465094257

  15. Carroll, S. M. (2019). Something Deeply Hidden: Quantum Worlds and the Emergence of Spacetime. Dutton.
    ISBN: 978-1524743017

  16. Rovelli, C. (2018). The Order of Time. Riverhead Books.
    ISBN: 978-0735216105

© 2023. All rights reserved.